Search The Virtual Driver
Tagged for Your Convenience
1940 Ford Coupe 2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 2012 Ford Explorer 2012 Jeep Wrangler 2012 Toyota Camry 2012 VW Beetle 2012 VW Passat 2013 Chevys 2013 Ford Explorer 2013 Ford Focus Electric 2013 Ford Fusion review 2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2013 Hyundai Veloster Turbo 2013 Lexus ES 350 2013 Lexus GS 2013 Mercedes GLK350 2013 NAIAS 2013 Nissan Altima 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2014 Kia Forte 2014 Lexus IS 2015 Camaro 2015 Mustang affordable carbon fiber airbag technology Alan Mulally Alfa Romeo 4C ALMS AMG SLS E-Cell ArmorAll AROnline Atlanta Motorsport Park Audi Audi bicycle Audi R18 Austin Powers Autocade Beverly Rae Kimes BMW BMW 3 Series BMW X4 BMW1 Series Bob Lutz Breitling watches Bryce Hoffman Buick Regal GS Buick Verano Cadillac ATS Cadillac CTS-V Cadillac CUE Cadillac XTS CAFE standards Camaro ZL1 Car Spy book Carroll Shelby Center for Automotive Research CES Chevy Cruze diesel Chevy Sonic Chevy Volt Chicago Auto Show China Auto 2012 Chip Foose Chrysler Clarion Cobra Jet Mustang Controlled Power Technologies Corvette C7 Craftsman CTX tractors Dan Wheldon De Lorean Detroit Auto Show Detroit Electric diesel engine Dodge Avenger Dodge Challenger domestic energy donuts drag racing DRB-Hicom driver alert Ducati Monster Eagle GB Edsel Ford electric bike electric vehicles EPA F-150 SuperCrew federal bureaucracyRolls Royce Bespoke Federal-Mogul Ferrari Ferrari F12 Fiat 500 Abarth Fiat-Chrysler Ford Ford Explorer Sport Ford F-150 EcoBoost Ford Focus ST Ford Fusion Ford Mustang Ford Transit Connect Forza Motorsport Frankfurt Motor Show Geneva Motor Show Global RallyCross GM Group Lotus HANS device Harley-Davidson Breakout Harley-Davidson Seventy-Two Harley-Davidson SuperLow Harley-Davidson Switchback healthcare Husqvarna hybrids Hyundai Hyundai Accent Hyundai Elantra Hyundai Genesis Coupe Hyundai Veloster IndyCar Infiniti Infiniti QX56 Jabuar Jaguar C-X16 Jaguar E-Type Jaguar F-Type Jaguar XJL Jeep concepts jet prropulsion Jim Clark Kia Forte Koup SX Kia Rio Kia Sorento Kia Soul Lamborghini Land Rover LR2 lead-acid batteries Lexus LS Lincoln MKX Lincoln Motor Company Lola LMP1 Lotus Lucire Lyonheart K Maserati Tipo 250F replica Mazda Mazda chair Mazda2 McLaren McLaren MP4-12C Spider McLaren P1 McLaren P1 interior McLarenToyota 4Runner Mercedes Mercedes 4Matic Mercedes comic book Mercedes GL Mercedes GLA Mercedes-Benz furniture metal matrix composite brakes Michael Schumacher Mini Countryman Mini Coupe Mini Roadster muscle cars MyFord Touch NAIAS nanoslide coating NASCAR Niki Lauda Nissan Leaf Nissan Pathfinder Nnissan Quest Nurburgring OnStar FMV Peter Wright Pininfarina Pope Benedict XVI Porsche 917 Porsche 918 Spyder Porsche Panamera Prius c Prius v racing Ram 1500 Ram ProMaster Range Rover restomod Roger Penske Rush movie Saab safety technology Santa Scion FR-S Siri smart Speed sport sedans Sportster Subaru BRZ Suzuki SX4 Team Lotus TechShop touchpad technology Toyota Toyota Prius c Toyota VenzaMcLaren MP4-12C Triumph Speed Triple TRW TRW touchpad UAW Udvar-Hazy Center Visteon Volvo S60 R-Design VW VW Beetle Convertible VW GTI VW Jetta Hybrid VW MQB VW Touareg TDI winter driving
« Cars In Context TV, Episode 3 | Main | Three Stories From No Story »
Friday
Jan112013

Dropping the Bomb In the Auto App War

By Christopher A. Sawyer

Diversified revenue streams are one way to bolster the bottom line and ride out downturns in your main business. In the past, car companies have tried to add brands in different sectors to increase profits, but this hasn’t always worked well; especially when the associated costs in the margins are as high as for mainstream brands. With the rapid increase in infotainment systems, however, the opportunity exists for a company to grow its bottom line by becoming the app king. Until recently, most folks expected this to be either Google or Apple, the largest app providers in the smartphone market.

Now Ford has announced it is giving its AppLink application programming interface (API) and software development kit (SDK) to any automaker who wants it. The combination is free of charge, with no restrictions on how they use it. The idea is to speed auto industry adoption of vehicle apps by attracting developers to build car-specific versions of current offerings as well as new items designed specifically for in-vehicle use. And it doesn’t hurt that this increases Ford’s opportunity to leverage both AppLink and Sync, much as Google has done with its Android software in the smartphone world. Not only does this have the chance of adding to Ford’s balance sheet, it could create a landscape of apps from which it could pick and choose without having to seed their development. Smart.

Or is it? Rival automakers have created their own architectures, and they reach deeply into the heart of the vehicle’s control systems. No one is going to want to open their operating systems to a competitor. Also, they worry Ford could delay the release of updates to benefit itself. Showing up to the party six months or a year later would put them in an also-ran position, and cast Ford as the industry technology leader.

It’s likely that a core of large and technology-leading automakers will continue to develop their own architectures, leading to an automotive version of the Apple, Google, Microsoft operating system competition we see in the computing sector. However, even paring the number of architectures down to a quartet of contenders would be a major improvement. This would entice more developers into the fray as the number of custom applications dropped. It also would allow those companies that wanted to keep control over their turf to do so, relieve the burden on the aftermarket to develop its own applications, and increase the robustness of both operating systems and apps.

It’s much too early to tell if and how Ford may benefit from this move, but it is the first sign of a contraction in the number of competing systems; a process that likely will pick up pace over the next couple of years. By staking its claim early, Ford has announced that it intends to lead, not be left behind.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>